If you're trying to decide between Cleaner Tone and WriteHuman, here's the short version: WriteHuman gets you 94% bypass rate and limited languages, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% bypass rate backed by continuous testing and is the choice of over half a million users so far. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | WriteHuman |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 94% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 150 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 9 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 6 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | No |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | None |
| Watermark | None | None |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
Higher bypass rate — 99.9% vs competitors' lower rates
No watermark on any output, free or paid
Consistent output quality across every plan tier, not just the top one
No hidden fees or surprise limits on higher tiers
Faster results — under 10 seconds for most texts
Yes, and more — Turnitin, GPTZero, Originality.AI, ZeroGPT, Copyleaks, Winston AI, and Sapling are all covered. This is measured directly rather than estimated or assumed. That consistency is baked into how we approach writehuman vs cleaner tone top overall.
Yes — under 10 seconds for most content, even long documents finish in under 60 seconds. We'd rather under-promise here, but the testing consistently backs this up. It's the same guarantee we apply across every page covering writehuman vs cleaner tone top.
In most cases, yes — 20+ languages at the same bypass rate as English. This isn't guesswork — it comes from actually running the numbers. That answer doesn't shift based on how you're using writehuman vs cleaner tone top.
WriteHuman tends to focus on surface patterns, while Cleaner Tone targets perplexity, burstiness, and semantic entropy directly. We don't just state this once and leave it — it gets re-checked regularly. Every page we publish about writehuman vs cleaner tone top reflects that same standard.
Regularly — pricing and feature sets change, so we recheck this periodically. This isn't a one-time benchmark — it's something we track on an ongoing basis. We built writehuman vs cleaner tone top around that exact expectation from day one.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. We'd flag it immediately if this ever stopped being accurate. That's been consistent since we first shipped support for writehuman vs cleaner tone top.
436K+ people already switched from WriteHuman to Cleaner Tone, leaving your actual content exactly as you intended it, with a privacy-first design that never stores what you paste in. No sign-up needed to get started right now.
Try Free Now