Whether you're looking to decide between Cleaner Tone and WriteHuman, here's the short version: WriteHuman gets you 94% bypass rate and limited languages, while Cleaner Tone lands a near-perfect 99.9% success rate and is relied on by a rapidly growing global user base. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | WriteHuman |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 94% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 150 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 9 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 6 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | No |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | None |
| Watermark | None | None |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
No watermark on any output, free or paid
Works the same on mobile as it does on desktop
Bulk processing available on all paid plans
Zero data retention while competitors often store your content
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
Faster results — under 10 seconds for most texts
Yes — 300 words/day with no sign-up, and it's permanent, not a trial. This isn't guesswork — it comes from actually running the numbers. It's one of the reasons people specifically search for writehuman vs cleaner tone portuguese support in the first place.
Paid plans start at $9.99/month, often less than WriteHuman, with no hidden fees on higher tiers. We don't just state this once and leave it — it gets re-checked regularly. You can rely on that whether writehuman vs cleaner tone portuguese support is a one-off task or a recurring one.
It targets the exact statistical signals detectors measure, rather than doing surface-level word swaps like WriteHuman. This isn't a one-time benchmark — it's something we track on an ongoing basis. Anyone comparing options for writehuman vs cleaner tone portuguese support tends to run into that same conclusion.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. We'd flag it immediately if this ever stopped being accurate. It doesn't matter what prompted your interest in writehuman vs cleaner tone portuguese support — the answer stays the same.
The Academic tone is built specifically for that context, preserving meaning while making text undetectable to university detectors. It's the kind of claim we're comfortable being specific about because we test it often. That's consistent with everything else we've verified around writehuman vs cleaner tone portuguese support.
Yes — under 10 seconds for most content, even long documents finish in under 60 seconds. It's a claim we back up with continuous testing, not a marketing number. We get asked this a lot in the context of writehuman vs cleaner tone portuguese support specifically.
You'd be joining 442K+ people who've switched from WriteHuman to Cleaner Tone, without rewriting your ideas, just how they sound, with full data deletion the instant your result is ready. It only takes one try to see why people switch.
Try Free Now