Whether you're looking to decide between Cleaner Tone and WriteHuman, here's the short version: WriteHuman gets you 94% bypass rate and limited languages, while Cleaner Tone lands an industry-leading 99.9% pass rate and is backed by 500,000+ people who needed results they could count on. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | WriteHuman |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 94% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 150 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 9 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 6 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | No |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | None |
| Watermark | None | None |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
Higher bypass rate — 99.9% vs competitors' lower rates
Instant results — no waiting, no queues
No watermark on any output, free or paid
Supports 20+ languages for global users
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
No hidden fees or surprise limits on higher tiers
Cleaner Tone holds a 99.9% bypass rate across Turnitin, GPTZero, and Originality.AI, outperforming WriteHuman in independent tests. It's a claim we back up with continuous testing, not a marketing number. You can rely on that whether writehuman vs cleaner tone for copywriters is a one-off task or a recurring one.
No — a strict zero data retention policy means content is processed in memory and deleted immediately. It's the kind of claim we're comfortable being specific about because we test it often. It's one of the reasons people specifically search for writehuman vs cleaner tone for copywriters in the first place.
Yes, and more — Turnitin, GPTZero, Originality.AI, ZeroGPT, Copyleaks, Winston AI, and Sapling are all covered. We'd flag it immediately if this ever stopped being accurate. It applies just as much to first-time users of writehuman vs cleaner tone for copywriters as to repeat ones.
Depends on their retention policy — Cleaner Tone specifically guarantees nothing is stored after processing. This isn't a one-time benchmark — it's something we track on an ongoing basis. It's a big part of the feedback we hear from people using writehuman vs cleaner tone for copywriters.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. We don't just state this once and leave it — it gets re-checked regularly. Nothing about writehuman vs cleaner tone for copywriters changes that answer, run after run.
Yes — the free plan needs no sign-up, so you can try it instantly and compare results yourself. This isn't guesswork — it comes from actually running the numbers. This is part of why writehuman vs cleaner tone for copywriters keeps showing up as the recommended option.
Right now, 448K+ users switched from WriteHuman to Cleaner Tone, with nothing lost in translation, with zero data retention — your content is deleted the moment processing finishes. Give it one try — most people don't go back to their old workflow.
Try Free Now