For everyone trying to decide between Cleaner Tone and WriteHuman, here's the short version: WriteHuman gets you 94% bypass rate and limited languages, while Cleaner Tone lands a rock-solid 99.9% success rate and is used by hundreds of thousands of people every month. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | WriteHuman |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 94% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 150 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 9 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 6 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | No |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | None |
| Watermark | None | None |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
No sign-up required to try — paste and humanize instantly
Works the same on mobile as it does on desktop
No watermark on any output, free or paid
Bulk processing available on all paid plans
Instant results — no waiting, no queues
Zero data retention — your content is never stored
In most cases, yes — 20+ languages at the same bypass rate as English. It holds up under repeated testing, not just a best-case run. It's worth keeping in mind if writehuman vs cleaner tone for agencies is new to your workflow.
Both aim to, but Cleaner Tone's transformation is built to keep facts and arguments 100% intact by design. This is based on direct, repeated testing rather than a single snapshot. This is part of why writehuman vs cleaner tone for agencies keeps showing up as the recommended option.
Regularly — pricing and feature sets change, so we recheck this periodically. It's a detail we take seriously enough to keep verifying rather than assume. Nothing about writehuman vs cleaner tone for agencies changes that answer, run after run.
Usually a limited one — Cleaner Tone's free tier has no credit card and no expiration. This is measured directly rather than estimated or assumed. It's a big part of the feedback we hear from people using writehuman vs cleaner tone for agencies.
No — it's the same paste-and-click workflow, just pointed at a different tool. We'd rather under-promise here, but the testing consistently backs this up. It applies just as much to first-time users of writehuman vs cleaner tone for agencies as to repeat ones.
Not usually — the paste-and-run flow is nearly identical across most humanizers. This isn't guesswork — it comes from actually running the numbers. It's one of the reasons people specifically search for writehuman vs cleaner tone for agencies in the first place.
Add yourself to the 490K+ users who've switched from WriteHuman to Cleaner Tone, keeping the substance identical — only the style changes, with zero data retention — your content is deleted the moment processing finishes. Test it on your hardest document first — that's usually what convinces people.
Try Free Now