When you're ready to decide between Cleaner Tone and Grammarly, here's the short version: Grammarly gets you 82% bypass rate and not designed for AI detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a near-perfect 99.9% success rate and is adopted by a community that's grown past 500,000 users. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 82% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | None |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 5 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 1 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat | Chat |
Better free plan — 300 words/day with no credit card required
API access for workflow integration
Zero data retention — your content is never stored
Faster results — under 10 seconds for most texts
Supports 20+ languages for global users
No hidden fees or surprise limits on higher tiers
No — a strict zero data retention policy means content is processed in memory and deleted immediately. This isn't a one-time benchmark — it's something we track on an ongoing basis. This holds whether you're running wordtune vs cleaner tone grammarly detector test once or as part of a daily workflow.
Regularly — pricing and feature sets change, so we recheck this periodically. We'd flag it immediately if this ever stopped being accurate. It's worth keeping in mind if wordtune vs cleaner tone grammarly detector test is new to your workflow.
Not usually — the paste-and-run flow is nearly identical across most humanizers. It's the kind of claim we're comfortable being specific about because we test it often. This is part of why wordtune vs cleaner tone grammarly detector test keeps showing up as the recommended option.
Yes — 300 words/day with no sign-up, and it's permanent, not a trial. It's a claim we back up with continuous testing, not a marketing number. Nothing about wordtune vs cleaner tone grammarly detector test changes that answer, run after run.
Yes — depth of transformation varies a lot; surface-level tools tend to leave detectable patterns behind. It's consistent across the testing we've run so far, and we keep testing. It's a big part of the feedback we hear from people using wordtune vs cleaner tone grammarly detector test.
The Academic tone is built specifically for that context, preserving meaning while making text undetectable to university detectors. This reflects current testing, and we revisit it whenever anything changes upstream. It applies just as much to first-time users of wordtune vs cleaner tone grammarly detector test as to repeat ones.
445K+ people already switched from Grammarly to Cleaner Tone, while keeping your original meaning 100% intact, with a privacy-first design that never stores what you paste in. Free tier available, upgrade only if you actually need to.
Try Free Now