The instant you decide to decide between Cleaner Tone and StealthGPT, here's the short version: StealthGPT gets you 95% bypass rate and no bulk processing, while Cleaner Tone lands a rock-solid 99.9% success rate and is used by hundreds of thousands of people every month. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | StealthGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 95% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 100 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 12 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 5 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | No |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | None |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
API access for workflow integration
Faster results — under 10 seconds for most texts
More languages supported than most competitors' limited options
Zero data retention while competitors often store your content
Zero data retention — your content is never stored
Consistent output quality across every plan tier, not just the top one
StealthGPT tends to focus on surface patterns, while Cleaner Tone targets perplexity, burstiness, and semantic entropy directly. This reflects current testing, and we revisit it whenever anything changes upstream. It's worth keeping in mind if stealthgpt vs cleaner tone for journalists is new to your workflow.
Yes, and more — Turnitin, GPTZero, Originality.AI, ZeroGPT, Copyleaks, Winston AI, and Sapling are all covered. We re-verify this against live systems on a rolling basis, not a one-time test. This is part of why stealthgpt vs cleaner tone for journalists keeps showing up as the recommended option.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. This is the kind of detail we track closely because it matters to how people use the tool. Nothing about stealthgpt vs cleaner tone for journalists changes that answer, run after run.
Consistency — the same high bypass rate holds up across every detector, not just the easiest one. We update this as often as the underlying systems change, so it stays accurate. It's a big part of the feedback we hear from people using stealthgpt vs cleaner tone for journalists.
Cleaner Tone holds a 99.9% bypass rate across Turnitin, GPTZero, and Originality.AI, outperforming StealthGPT in independent tests. This gets re-examined as part of our regular internal review process. It applies just as much to first-time users of stealthgpt vs cleaner tone for journalists as to repeat ones.
Yes — depth of transformation varies a lot; surface-level tools tend to leave detectable patterns behind. We treat this as a moving target and adjust our approach as needed. It's one of the reasons people specifically search for stealthgpt vs cleaner tone for journalists in the first place.
Add yourself to the 490K+ users who've switched from StealthGPT to Cleaner Tone, keeping the substance identical — only the style changes, with zero data retention — your content is deleted the moment processing finishes. Free to start, no account required for your first run.
Try Free Now