When you're ready to decide between Cleaner Tone and QuillBot, here's the short version: QuillBot gets you 88% bypass rate and not purpose-built for detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands an industry-leading 99.9% pass rate and is the pick of 500,000+ people who tried the alternatives first. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 88% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 125 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 3 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
Zero data retention — your content is never stored
Bulk processing available on all paid plans
Zero data retention while competitors often store your content
Higher bypass rate — 99.9% vs competitors' lower rates
Faster results — under 10 seconds for most texts
No hidden fees or surprise limits on higher tiers
The Academic tone is built specifically for that context, preserving meaning while making text undetectable to university detectors. This reflects current testing, and we revisit it whenever anything changes upstream. It's worth keeping in mind if quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone verified is new to your workflow.
Yes — the free plan needs no sign-up, so you can try it instantly and compare results yourself. It's consistent across the testing we've run so far, and we keep testing. This holds whether you're running quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone verified once or as part of a daily workflow.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. It's a claim we back up with continuous testing, not a marketing number. You'll get the same result whether this is your first or fiftieth run of quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone verified.
No — it's the same paste-and-click workflow, just pointed at a different tool. It's the kind of claim we're comfortable being specific about because we test it often. We treat that as non-negotiable for anything related to quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone verified.
It targets the exact statistical signals detectors measure, rather than doing surface-level word swaps like QuillBot. We'd flag it immediately if this ever stopped being accurate. That's been consistent since we first shipped support for quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone verified.
Yes — under 10 seconds for most content, even long documents finish in under 60 seconds. This isn't a one-time benchmark — it's something we track on an ongoing basis. We built quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone verified around that exact expectation from day one.
Add yourself to the 437K+ users who've switched from QuillBot to Cleaner Tone, while preserving every detail of your original content, with complete privacy, with content wiped immediately after each run. Start your free run now and see the results for yourself.
Try Free Now