Whether you're looking to decide between Cleaner Tone and QuillBot, here's the short version: QuillBot gets you 88% bypass rate and not purpose-built for detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% verified success rate and is already trusted by 500,000+ people across dozens of countries. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 88% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 125 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 3 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
Works the same on mobile as it does on desktop
Higher bypass rate — 99.9% vs competitors' lower rates
Better free plan — 300 words/day with no credit card required
Supports 20+ languages for global users
API access for workflow integration
24/7 support instead of email-only ticket queues
Yes — under 10 seconds for most content, even long documents finish in under 60 seconds. It holds up under repeated testing, not just a best-case run. That's been consistent since we first shipped support for quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone portuguese support.
Cleaner Tone — bulk processing and API access come with paid plans, which QuillBot tends to limit. This is based on direct, repeated testing rather than a single snapshot. We treat that as non-negotiable for anything related to quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone portuguese support.
In most cases, yes — 20+ languages at the same bypass rate as English. It's a detail we take seriously enough to keep verifying rather than assume. You'll get the same result whether this is your first or fiftieth run of quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone portuguese support.
Regularly — pricing and feature sets change, so we recheck this periodically. This is measured directly rather than estimated or assumed. This holds whether you're running quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone portuguese support once or as part of a daily workflow.
Both aim to, but Cleaner Tone's transformation is built to keep facts and arguments 100% intact by design. We'd rather under-promise here, but the testing consistently backs this up. It's worth keeping in mind if quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone portuguese support is new to your workflow.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. This isn't guesswork — it comes from actually running the numbers. This is part of why quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone portuguese support keeps showing up as the recommended option.
479K+ users have switched from QuillBot to Cleaner Tone, with nothing lost in translation, with a zero-retention pipeline built specifically to protect your content. Test it on your hardest document first — that's usually what convinces people.
Try Free Now