When it's time to decide between Cleaner Tone and QuillBot, here's the short version: QuillBot gets you 88% bypass rate and not purpose-built for detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% bypass rate backed by continuous testing and is the choice of over half a million users so far. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 88% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 125 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 3 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
More languages supported than most competitors' limited options
Higher bypass rate — 99.9% vs competitors' lower rates
Zero data retention — your content is never stored
No hidden fees or surprise limits on higher tiers
Supports 20+ languages for global users
Faster results — under 10 seconds for most texts
No — it's the same paste-and-click workflow, just pointed at a different tool. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. That consistency is baked into how we approach quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone for writers overall.
Depends on their retention policy — Cleaner Tone specifically guarantees nothing is stored after processing. It holds up under repeated testing, not just a best-case run. It's the same guarantee we apply across every page covering quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone for writers.
Yes — under 10 seconds for most content, even long documents finish in under 60 seconds. This is based on direct, repeated testing rather than a single snapshot. That answer doesn't shift based on how you're using quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone for writers.
You can, though most users find Cleaner Tone covers everything on its own. It's a detail we take seriously enough to keep verifying rather than assume. Every page we publish about quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone for writers reflects that same standard.
It targets the exact statistical signals detectors measure, rather than doing surface-level word swaps like QuillBot. This is measured directly rather than estimated or assumed. We built quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone for writers around that exact expectation from day one.
Mainly the higher bypass rate, better free plan, zero data retention, and faster processing. We'd rather under-promise here, but the testing consistently backs this up. That's been consistent since we first shipped support for quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone for writers.
429K+ people already switched from QuillBot to Cleaner Tone, leaving your actual content exactly as you intended it, with a privacy-first design that never stores what you paste in. See it work on your own content before you decide on anything else.
Try Free Now