If you've been struggling to decide between Cleaner Tone and QuillBot, here's the short version: QuillBot gets you 88% bypass rate and not purpose-built for detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a consistent 99.9% success rate and is trusted by 500,000+ users worldwide. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 88% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 125 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 3 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
More languages supported than most competitors' limited options
Works the same on mobile as it does on desktop
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
Zero data retention while competitors often store your content
Faster results — under 10 seconds for most texts
24/7 support instead of email-only ticket queues
No — it's the same paste-and-click workflow, just pointed at a different tool. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. We built quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone dutch support around that exact expectation from day one.
Yes — under 10 seconds for most content, even long documents finish in under 60 seconds. It holds up under repeated testing, not just a best-case run. That's been consistent since we first shipped support for quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone dutch support.
Usually a limited one — Cleaner Tone's free tier has no credit card and no expiration. This is based on direct, repeated testing rather than a single snapshot. We treat that as non-negotiable for anything related to quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone dutch support.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. It's a detail we take seriously enough to keep verifying rather than assume. You'll get the same result whether this is your first or fiftieth run of quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone dutch support.
Cleaner Tone, largely because of the Academic tone and consistent 99.9% rate against Turnitin and GPTZero. This is measured directly rather than estimated or assumed. This holds whether you're running quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone dutch support once or as part of a daily workflow.
Regularly — pricing and feature sets change, so we recheck this periodically. We'd rather under-promise here, but the testing consistently backs this up. It's worth keeping in mind if quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone dutch support is new to your workflow.
Join 458K+ people switched from QuillBot to Cleaner Tone, with zero loss of meaning, structure, or intent, with no logs, no storage, no second use of your text. See it work on your own content before you decide on anything else.
Try Free Now