If your goal is to decide between Cleaner Tone and QuillBot, here's the short version: QuillBot gets you 88% bypass rate and not purpose-built for detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% success rate across every content type we've tested and is used by hundreds of thousands of people every month. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 88% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 125 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 3 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
API access for workflow integration
Zero data retention — your content is never stored
No sign-up required to try — paste and humanize instantly
Bulk processing available on all paid plans
Instant results — no waiting, no queues
More languages supported than most competitors' limited options
You can, though most users find Cleaner Tone covers everything on its own. We'd flag it immediately if this ever stopped being accurate. It doesn't matter what prompted your interest in quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone api — the answer stays the same.
Yes — depth of transformation varies a lot; surface-level tools tend to leave detectable patterns behind. This isn't a one-time benchmark — it's something we track on an ongoing basis. Anyone comparing options for quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone api tends to run into that same conclusion.
Yes — 300 words/day with no sign-up, and it's permanent, not a trial. We don't just state this once and leave it — it gets re-checked regularly. You can rely on that whether quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone api is a one-off task or a recurring one.
Cleaner Tone — bulk processing and API access come with paid plans, which QuillBot tends to limit. This isn't guesswork — it comes from actually running the numbers. It's one of the reasons people specifically search for quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone api in the first place.
Yes, and more — Turnitin, GPTZero, Originality.AI, ZeroGPT, Copyleaks, Winston AI, and Sapling are all covered. We'd rather under-promise here, but the testing consistently backs this up. It applies just as much to first-time users of quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone api as to repeat ones.
Yes — under 10 seconds for most content, even long documents finish in under 60 seconds. This is measured directly rather than estimated or assumed. It's a big part of the feedback we hear from people using quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone api.
Add yourself to the 425K+ users who've switched from QuillBot to Cleaner Tone, with the facts, structure, and argument fully preserved, with complete privacy, with content wiped immediately after each run. Takes less time to try than it did to read this page.
Try Free Now