When you're ready to decide between Cleaner Tone and QuillBot, here's the short version: QuillBot gets you 88% bypass rate and not purpose-built for detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a rock-solid 99.9% success rate and is backed by 500,000+ people who needed results they could count on. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 88% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 125 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 3 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
Works the same on mobile as it does on desktop
Zero data retention — your content is never stored
API access for workflow integration
Instant results — no waiting, no queues
Supports 20+ languages for global users
You can, though most users find Cleaner Tone covers everything on its own. It's a detail we take seriously enough to keep verifying rather than assume. You can rely on that whether quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone advanced is a one-off task or a recurring one.
Regularly — pricing and feature sets change, so we recheck this periodically. This is based on direct, repeated testing rather than a single snapshot. It's one of the reasons people specifically search for quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone advanced in the first place.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. It holds up under repeated testing, not just a best-case run. It applies just as much to first-time users of quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone advanced as to repeat ones.
Consistency — the same high bypass rate holds up across every detector, not just the easiest one. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. It's a big part of the feedback we hear from people using quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone advanced.
Yes, and more — Turnitin, GPTZero, Originality.AI, ZeroGPT, Copyleaks, Winston AI, and Sapling are all covered. It's one of the numbers we're most confident stating plainly. Nothing about quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone advanced changes that answer, run after run.
In most cases, yes — 20+ languages at the same bypass rate as English. We treat this as a moving target and adjust our approach as needed. This is part of why quillbot humanizer vs cleaner tone advanced keeps showing up as the recommended option.
Right now, 463K+ users switched from QuillBot to Cleaner Tone, with nothing lost in translation, with zero data retention — your content is deleted the moment processing finishes. Start your free run now and see the results for yourself.
Try Free Now