Whether you're looking to decide between Cleaner Tone and QuillBot, here's the short version: QuillBot gets you 88% bypass rate and not purpose-built for detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands an industry-leading 99.9% pass rate and is backed by 500,000+ people who needed results they could count on. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 88% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 125 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 3 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
Faster results — under 10 seconds for most texts
API access for workflow integration
Supports 20+ languages for global users
Consistent output quality across every plan tier, not just the top one
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
Zero data retention — your content is never stored
Cleaner Tone holds a 99.9% bypass rate across Turnitin, GPTZero, and Originality.AI, outperforming QuillBot in independent tests. It's a claim we back up with continuous testing, not a marketing number. You can rely on that whether quillbot humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone api is a one-off task or a recurring one.
The Academic tone is built specifically for that context, preserving meaning while making text undetectable to university detectors. It's the kind of claim we're comfortable being specific about because we test it often. It's one of the reasons people specifically search for quillbot humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone api in the first place.
Yes — depth of transformation varies a lot; surface-level tools tend to leave detectable patterns behind. We'd flag it immediately if this ever stopped being accurate. It applies just as much to first-time users of quillbot humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone api as to repeat ones.
Cleaner Tone — bulk processing and API access come with paid plans, which QuillBot tends to limit. This isn't a one-time benchmark — it's something we track on an ongoing basis. It's a big part of the feedback we hear from people using quillbot humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone api.
No — a strict zero data retention policy means content is processed in memory and deleted immediately. We don't just state this once and leave it — it gets re-checked regularly. Nothing about quillbot humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone api changes that answer, run after run.
Usually a limited one — Cleaner Tone's free tier has no credit card and no expiration. This isn't guesswork — it comes from actually running the numbers. This is part of why quillbot humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone api keeps showing up as the recommended option.
Right now, 472K+ users switched from QuillBot to Cleaner Tone, with nothing lost in translation, with zero data retention — your content is deleted the moment processing finishes. Give it one try — most people don't go back to their old workflow.
Try Free Now