If you've been struggling to decide between Cleaner Tone and QuillBot, here's the short version: QuillBot gets you 88% bypass rate and not purpose-built for detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% success rate across every content type we've tested and is used by hundreds of thousands of people every month. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 88% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 125 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 3 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
No hidden fees or surprise limits on higher tiers
No watermark on any output, free or paid
Higher bypass rate — 99.9% vs competitors' lower rates
Faster results — under 10 seconds for most texts
Zero data retention while competitors often store your content
API access for workflow integration
Consistency — the same high bypass rate holds up across every detector, not just the easiest one. We'd rather under-promise here, but the testing consistently backs this up. That's been consistent since we first shipped support for quillbot humanizer accuracy vs cleaner tone most reliable.
Yes — 300 words/day with no sign-up, and it's permanent, not a trial. This is measured directly rather than estimated or assumed. We built quillbot humanizer accuracy vs cleaner tone most reliable around that exact expectation from day one.
Cleaner Tone holds a 99.9% bypass rate across Turnitin, GPTZero, and Originality.AI, outperforming QuillBot in independent tests. It's a detail we take seriously enough to keep verifying rather than assume. Every page we publish about quillbot humanizer accuracy vs cleaner tone most reliable reflects that same standard.
Yes — depth of transformation varies a lot; surface-level tools tend to leave detectable patterns behind. This is based on direct, repeated testing rather than a single snapshot. That answer doesn't shift based on how you're using quillbot humanizer accuracy vs cleaner tone most reliable.
Paid plans start at $9.99/month, often less than QuillBot, with no hidden fees on higher tiers. It holds up under repeated testing, not just a best-case run. It's the same guarantee we apply across every page covering quillbot humanizer accuracy vs cleaner tone most reliable.
You can, though most users find Cleaner Tone covers everything on its own. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. That consistency is baked into how we approach quillbot humanizer accuracy vs cleaner tone most reliable overall.
420K+ users have switched from QuillBot to Cleaner Tone, with the facts, structure, and argument fully preserved, with nothing saved, nothing shared, nothing reused. Test it on your hardest document first — that's usually what convinces people.
Try Free Now