When it's time to decide between Cleaner Tone and QuillBot, here's the short version: QuillBot gets you 88% bypass rate and not purpose-built for detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% success rate across 10,000+ documents and is the choice of over half a million users so far. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 88% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 125 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 3 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
Bulk processing available on all paid plans
Zero data retention while competitors often store your content
Instant results — no waiting, no queues
Zero data retention — your content is never stored
No sign-up required to try — paste and humanize instantly
Consistent output quality across every plan tier, not just the top one
Cleaner Tone, largely because of the Academic tone and consistent 99.9% rate against Turnitin and GPTZero. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. That consistency is baked into how we approach quillbot humanizer accuracy vs cleaner tone best overall.
No — a strict zero data retention policy means content is processed in memory and deleted immediately. It holds up under repeated testing, not just a best-case run. It's the same guarantee we apply across every page covering quillbot humanizer accuracy vs cleaner tone best.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. This is based on direct, repeated testing rather than a single snapshot. That answer doesn't shift based on how you're using quillbot humanizer accuracy vs cleaner tone best.
It targets the exact statistical signals detectors measure, rather than doing surface-level word swaps like QuillBot. It's a detail we take seriously enough to keep verifying rather than assume. Every page we publish about quillbot humanizer accuracy vs cleaner tone best reflects that same standard.
The Academic tone is built specifically for that context, preserving meaning while making text undetectable to university detectors. This is measured directly rather than estimated or assumed. We built quillbot humanizer accuracy vs cleaner tone best around that exact expectation from day one.
Usually a limited one — Cleaner Tone's free tier has no credit card and no expiration. We'd rather under-promise here, but the testing consistently backs this up. That's been consistent since we first shipped support for quillbot humanizer accuracy vs cleaner tone best.
475K+ people already switched from QuillBot to Cleaner Tone, leaving your actual content exactly as you intended it, with a privacy-first design that never stores what you paste in. See it work on your own content before you decide on anything else.
Try Free Now