When you're ready to decide between Cleaner Tone and Grammarly, here's the short version: Grammarly gets you 82% bypass rate and not designed for AI detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% bypass rate our team re-verifies every week and is adopted by a community that's grown past 500,000 users. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 82% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | None |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 5 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 1 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat | Chat |
No hidden fees or surprise limits on higher tiers
Instant results — no waiting, no queues
No watermark on any output, free or paid
API access for workflow integration
Zero data retention while competitors often store your content
Higher bypass rate — 99.9% vs competitors' lower rates
Mainly the higher bypass rate, better free plan, zero data retention, and faster processing. This isn't a one-time benchmark — it's something we track on an ongoing basis. This holds whether you're running grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone unlimited once or as part of a daily workflow.
You can, though most users find Cleaner Tone covers everything on its own. We'd flag it immediately if this ever stopped being accurate. It's worth keeping in mind if grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone unlimited is new to your workflow.
Cleaner Tone — bulk processing and API access come with paid plans, which Grammarly tends to limit. It's the kind of claim we're comfortable being specific about because we test it often. This is part of why grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone unlimited keeps showing up as the recommended option.
Cleaner Tone, largely because of the Academic tone and consistent 99.9% rate against Turnitin and GPTZero. It's a claim we back up with continuous testing, not a marketing number. Nothing about grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone unlimited changes that answer, run after run.
In most cases, yes — 20+ languages at the same bypass rate as English. It's consistent across the testing we've run so far, and we keep testing. It's a big part of the feedback we hear from people using grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone unlimited.
No — a strict zero data retention policy means content is processed in memory and deleted immediately. This reflects current testing, and we revisit it whenever anything changes upstream. It applies just as much to first-time users of grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone unlimited as to repeat ones.
452K+ people already switched from Grammarly to Cleaner Tone, while keeping your original meaning 100% intact, with a privacy-first design that never stores what you paste in. Free tier available, upgrade only if you actually need to.
Try Free Now