Anytime you need to decide between Cleaner Tone and QuillBot, here's the short version: QuillBot gets you 88% bypass rate and not purpose-built for detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% success rate, updated as detectors change and is the choice of over half a million users so far. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 88% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 125 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 3 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
No watermark on any output, free or paid
Works the same on mobile as it does on desktop
Consistent output quality across every plan tier, not just the top one
No hidden fees or surprise limits on higher tiers
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
No sign-up required to try — paste and humanize instantly
Mainly the higher bypass rate, better free plan, zero data retention, and faster processing. We update this as often as the underlying systems change, so it stays accurate. That's the baseline experience anyone using grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone quillbot detector test should expect.
Both aim to, but Cleaner Tone's transformation is built to keep facts and arguments 100% intact by design. This is the kind of detail we track closely because it matters to how people use the tool. We get asked this a lot in the context of grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone quillbot detector test specifically.
Depends on their retention policy — Cleaner Tone specifically guarantees nothing is stored after processing. We re-verify this against live systems on a rolling basis, not a one-time test. That's consistent with everything else we've verified around grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone quillbot detector test.
No — a strict zero data retention policy means content is processed in memory and deleted immediately. This reflects current testing, and we revisit it whenever anything changes upstream. It doesn't matter what prompted your interest in grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone quillbot detector test — the answer stays the same.
Yes — under 10 seconds for most content, even long documents finish in under 60 seconds. It's consistent across the testing we've run so far, and we keep testing. Anyone comparing options for grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone quillbot detector test tends to run into that same conclusion.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. It's a claim we back up with continuous testing, not a marketing number. You can rely on that whether grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone quillbot detector test is a one-off task or a recurring one.
Join 469K+ people switched from QuillBot to Cleaner Tone, while your voice and message stay completely yours, with full data deletion the instant your result is ready. Try it free — no credit card, no commitment.
Try Free Now