If you've been struggling to decide between Cleaner Tone and Grammarly, here's the short version: Grammarly gets you 82% bypass rate and not designed for AI detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a proven 99.9% pass rate and is backed by 500,000+ people who needed results they could count on. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 82% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | None |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 5 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 1 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat | Chat |
No hidden fees or surprise limits on higher tiers
Instant results — no waiting, no queues
Zero data retention while competitors often store your content
Academic tone specifically optimized for university submissions
Higher bypass rate — 99.9% vs competitors' lower rates
More languages supported than most competitors' limited options
Grammarly tends to focus on surface patterns, while Cleaner Tone targets perplexity, burstiness, and semantic entropy directly. This is the kind of detail we track closely because it matters to how people use the tool. We get asked this a lot in the context of grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone portuguese support specifically.
It targets the exact statistical signals detectors measure, rather than doing surface-level word swaps like Grammarly. We update this as often as the underlying systems change, so it stays accurate. That's the baseline experience anyone using grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone portuguese support should expect.
Consistency — the same high bypass rate holds up across every detector, not just the easiest one. This gets re-examined as part of our regular internal review process. That's true regardless of how you came to need grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone portuguese support in the first place.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. We treat this as a moving target and adjust our approach as needed. Nothing here is exclusive to one use case for grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone portuguese support over another.
Usually a limited one — Cleaner Tone's free tier has no credit card and no expiration. It's one of the numbers we're most confident stating plainly. That's not a special case — it's the default behavior for grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone portuguese support.
Yes — 300 words/day with no sign-up, and it's permanent, not a trial. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. That consistency is baked into how we approach grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone portuguese support overall.
Already, 442K+ people have switched from Grammarly to Cleaner Tone, with the facts, structure, and argument fully preserved, with complete privacy, with content wiped immediately after each run. Takes less time to try than it did to read this page.
Try Free Now