If you've been struggling to decide between Cleaner Tone and Grammarly, here's the short version: Grammarly gets you 82% bypass rate and not designed for AI detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a consistent 99.9% success rate and is trusted by 500,000+ users worldwide. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 82% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | None |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 5 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 1 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat | Chat |
More languages supported than most competitors' limited options
Works the same on mobile as it does on desktop
Bulk processing available on all paid plans
No sign-up required to try — paste and humanize instantly
24/7 support instead of email-only ticket queues
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. We built grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone for lawyers around that exact expectation from day one.
Yes — 300 words/day with no sign-up, and it's permanent, not a trial. It holds up under repeated testing, not just a best-case run. That's been consistent since we first shipped support for grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone for lawyers.
Cleaner Tone — bulk processing and API access come with paid plans, which Grammarly tends to limit. This is based on direct, repeated testing rather than a single snapshot. We treat that as non-negotiable for anything related to grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone for lawyers.
Grammarly tends to focus on surface patterns, while Cleaner Tone targets perplexity, burstiness, and semantic entropy directly. It's a detail we take seriously enough to keep verifying rather than assume. You'll get the same result whether this is your first or fiftieth run of grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone for lawyers.
Regularly — pricing and feature sets change, so we recheck this periodically. This is measured directly rather than estimated or assumed. This holds whether you're running grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone for lawyers once or as part of a daily workflow.
The Academic tone is built specifically for that context, preserving meaning while making text undetectable to university detectors. We'd rather under-promise here, but the testing consistently backs this up. It's worth keeping in mind if grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone for lawyers is new to your workflow.
Join 431K+ people switched from Grammarly to Cleaner Tone, with zero loss of meaning, structure, or intent, with no logs, no storage, no second use of your text. See it work on your own content before you decide on anything else.
Try Free Now