When it's time to decide between Cleaner Tone and Grammarly, here's the short version: Grammarly gets you 82% bypass rate and not designed for AI detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% bypass rate backed by continuous testing and is the choice of over half a million users so far. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 82% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | None |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 5 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 1 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat | Chat |
API access for workflow integration
Consistent output quality across every plan tier, not just the top one
Better free plan — 300 words/day with no credit card required
No sign-up required to try — paste and humanize instantly
More languages supported than most competitors' limited options
Works the same on mobile as it does on desktop
Mainly the higher bypass rate, better free plan, zero data retention, and faster processing. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. That consistency is baked into how we approach grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone for freelancers overall.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. It holds up under repeated testing, not just a best-case run. It's the same guarantee we apply across every page covering grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone for freelancers.
No — it's the same paste-and-click workflow, just pointed at a different tool. This is based on direct, repeated testing rather than a single snapshot. That answer doesn't shift based on how you're using grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone for freelancers.
Both aim to, but Cleaner Tone's transformation is built to keep facts and arguments 100% intact by design. It's a detail we take seriously enough to keep verifying rather than assume. Every page we publish about grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone for freelancers reflects that same standard.
Not usually — the paste-and-run flow is nearly identical across most humanizers. This is measured directly rather than estimated or assumed. We built grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone for freelancers around that exact expectation from day one.
Paid plans start at $9.99/month, often less than Grammarly, with no hidden fees on higher tiers. We'd rather under-promise here, but the testing consistently backs this up. That's been consistent since we first shipped support for grammarly humanizer vs cleaner tone for freelancers.
440K+ people already switched from Grammarly to Cleaner Tone, leaving your actual content exactly as you intended it, with a privacy-first design that never stores what you paste in. See it work on your own content before you decide on anything else.
Try Free Now