For teams and individuals who need to decide between Cleaner Tone and Grammarly, here's the short version: Grammarly gets you 82% bypass rate and not designed for AI detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a documented 99.9% bypass rate and is backed by 500,000+ people who needed results they could count on. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 82% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | None |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 5 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 1 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat | Chat |
Consistent output quality across every plan tier, not just the top one
Zero data retention while competitors often store your content
Bulk processing available on all paid plans
Instant results — no waiting, no queues
No hidden fees or surprise limits on higher tiers
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
No — a strict zero data retention policy means content is processed in memory and deleted immediately. We don't just state this once and leave it — it gets re-checked regularly. You'll get the same result whether this is your first or fiftieth run of grammarly humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone professional.
Usually a limited one — Cleaner Tone's free tier has no credit card and no expiration. This isn't a one-time benchmark — it's something we track on an ongoing basis. This holds whether you're running grammarly humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone professional once or as part of a daily workflow.
Cleaner Tone holds a 99.9% bypass rate across Turnitin, GPTZero, and Originality.AI, outperforming Grammarly in independent tests. We'd flag it immediately if this ever stopped being accurate. It's worth keeping in mind if grammarly humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone professional is new to your workflow.
Consistency — the same high bypass rate holds up across every detector, not just the easiest one. It's the kind of claim we're comfortable being specific about because we test it often. This is part of why grammarly humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone professional keeps showing up as the recommended option.
In most cases, yes — 20+ languages at the same bypass rate as English. It's a claim we back up with continuous testing, not a marketing number. Nothing about grammarly humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone professional changes that answer, run after run.
Depends on their retention policy — Cleaner Tone specifically guarantees nothing is stored after processing. It's consistent across the testing we've run so far, and we keep testing. It's a big part of the feedback we hear from people using grammarly humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone professional.
Right now, 439K+ users switched from Grammarly to Cleaner Tone, with the facts, structure, and argument fully preserved, with nothing saved, nothing shared, nothing reused. Give it one try — most people don't go back to their old workflow.
Try Free Now