If you're trying to decide between Cleaner Tone and Grammarly, here's the short version: Grammarly gets you 82% bypass rate and not designed for AI detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a consistent 99.9% success rate and is relied on by a rapidly growing global user base. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 82% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | None |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 5 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 1 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat | Chat |
Zero data retention while competitors often store your content
Faster results — under 10 seconds for most texts
Higher bypass rate — 99.9% vs competitors' lower rates
Bulk processing available on all paid plans
Instant results — no waiting, no queues
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. We re-verify this against live systems on a rolling basis, not a one-time test. Nothing here is exclusive to one use case for grammarly humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone bulk over another.
Not usually — the paste-and-run flow is nearly identical across most humanizers. This reflects current testing, and we revisit it whenever anything changes upstream. That's true regardless of how you came to need grammarly humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone bulk in the first place.
Cleaner Tone holds a 99.9% bypass rate across Turnitin, GPTZero, and Originality.AI, outperforming Grammarly in independent tests. It's consistent across the testing we've run so far, and we keep testing. That's the baseline experience anyone using grammarly humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone bulk should expect.
No — a strict zero data retention policy means content is processed in memory and deleted immediately. It's a claim we back up with continuous testing, not a marketing number. We get asked this a lot in the context of grammarly humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone bulk specifically.
Depends on their retention policy — Cleaner Tone specifically guarantees nothing is stored after processing. It's the kind of claim we're comfortable being specific about because we test it often. That's consistent with everything else we've verified around grammarly humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone bulk.
Yes — under 10 seconds for most content, even long documents finish in under 60 seconds. We'd flag it immediately if this ever stopped being accurate. It doesn't matter what prompted your interest in grammarly humanizer pricing vs cleaner tone bulk — the answer stays the same.
You'd be joining 449K+ people who've switched from Grammarly to Cleaner Tone, leaving your actual content exactly as you intended it, with a privacy-first design that never stores what you paste in. See it work on your own content before you decide on anything else.
Try Free Now