For those who need to decide between Cleaner Tone and FilterNote, here's the short version: FilterNote gets you 89% bypass rate and no bulk processing, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% pass rate that's held steady for months and is relied on by a rapidly growing global user base. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | FilterNote |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 89% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 100 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 18 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 5 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | No |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored 60 days |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
API access for workflow integration
Zero data retention — your content is never stored
Zero data retention while competitors often store your content
24/7 support instead of email-only ticket queues
Better free plan — 300 words/day with no credit card required
Instant results — no waiting, no queues
Depends on their retention policy — Cleaner Tone specifically guarantees nothing is stored after processing. This is based on direct, repeated testing rather than a single snapshot. Nothing here is exclusive to one use case for filternote vs cleaner tone api over another.
Usually a limited one — Cleaner Tone's free tier has no credit card and no expiration. It holds up under repeated testing, not just a best-case run. That's true regardless of how you came to need filternote vs cleaner tone api in the first place.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. That's the baseline experience anyone using filternote vs cleaner tone api should expect.
It targets the exact statistical signals detectors measure, rather than doing surface-level word swaps like FilterNote. It's one of the numbers we're most confident stating plainly. We get asked this a lot in the context of filternote vs cleaner tone api specifically.
Cleaner Tone — bulk processing and API access come with paid plans, which FilterNote tends to limit. We treat this as a moving target and adjust our approach as needed. That's consistent with everything else we've verified around filternote vs cleaner tone api.
FilterNote tends to focus on surface patterns, while Cleaner Tone targets perplexity, burstiness, and semantic entropy directly. This gets re-examined as part of our regular internal review process. It doesn't matter what prompted your interest in filternote vs cleaner tone api — the answer stays the same.
You'd be joining 480K+ people who've switched from FilterNote to Cleaner Tone, leaving your actual content exactly as you intended it, with a privacy-first design that never stores what you paste in. Free tier available, upgrade only if you actually need to.
Try Free Now