If you've been struggling to decide between Cleaner Tone and FilterNote, here's the short version: FilterNote gets you 89% bypass rate and no bulk processing, while Cleaner Tone lands a consistent 99.9% success rate and is trusted by 500,000+ users worldwide. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | FilterNote |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 89% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 100 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 18 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 5 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | No |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored 60 days |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
Better free plan — 300 words/day with no credit card required
Works the same on mobile as it does on desktop
24/7 support instead of email-only ticket queues
Academic tone specifically optimized for university submissions
Instant results — no waiting, no queues
Bulk processing available on all paid plans
Consistency — the same high bypass rate holds up across every detector, not just the easiest one. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. We built filternote pricing vs cleaner tone api around that exact expectation from day one.
In most cases, yes — 20+ languages at the same bypass rate as English. It holds up under repeated testing, not just a best-case run. That's been consistent since we first shipped support for filternote pricing vs cleaner tone api.
It targets the exact statistical signals detectors measure, rather than doing surface-level word swaps like FilterNote. This is based on direct, repeated testing rather than a single snapshot. We treat that as non-negotiable for anything related to filternote pricing vs cleaner tone api.
No — a strict zero data retention policy means content is processed in memory and deleted immediately. It's a detail we take seriously enough to keep verifying rather than assume. You'll get the same result whether this is your first or fiftieth run of filternote pricing vs cleaner tone api.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. This is measured directly rather than estimated or assumed. This holds whether you're running filternote pricing vs cleaner tone api once or as part of a daily workflow.
Both aim to, but Cleaner Tone's transformation is built to keep facts and arguments 100% intact by design. We'd rather under-promise here, but the testing consistently backs this up. It's worth keeping in mind if filternote pricing vs cleaner tone api is new to your workflow.
Join 429K+ people switched from FilterNote to Cleaner Tone, with zero loss of meaning, structure, or intent, with no logs, no storage, no second use of your text. See it work on your own content before you decide on anything else.
Try Free Now