Researching Filternote Pricing Features? FilterNote stores your content for 60 days and places visible watermarks on free output. Cleaner Tone deletes your content immediately after processing, adds zero watermarks, and delivers a 99.9% bypass rate across 20+ languages. For privacy-conscious users, the choice is straightforward.
For anyone who needs to get a straight answer on filternote pricing features, here it is: Cleaner Tone runs a multi-layered transformation that lands a 99.9% pass rate that's held steady for months, and it's trusted by 500,000+ users worldwide. The rest of this page covers exactly why, feature by feature.
FilterNote has no API. Cleaner Tone's Professional plan includes full REST API access.
FilterNote does not support bulk document processing. Cleaner Tone's paid plans do, for team and agency workflows.
FilterNote is among the slower humanizers on the market. Cleaner Tone processes content nearly twice as fast.
In testing across 50+ documents and 6 major AI detectors, Cleaner Tone achieved a 99.9% bypass rate. FilterNote achieved 89% — meaning it flags roughly 1 in 9 documents.
| Feature | Cleaner Tone | FilterNote |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% — verified weekly | 89% in testing |
| Processing Speed | Under 10 seconds | ~18 seconds |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day — no card | 100 words/day |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored for 60 days |
| Watermark | None on any plan | Visible on free tier |
| Languages | 20+ languages | 5 languages |
| Bulk Processing | Available on paid plans | Not available |
| API Access | Professional+ plan | Not available |
Rated 4.8/5 by 14,592+ users
Trusted by students, academics, content creators, and businesses worldwide
Up to 60 days. Cleaner Tone deletes content immediately after processing. This isn't a one-time benchmark — it's something we track on an ongoing basis. Anyone comparing options for filternote pricing features tends to run into that same conclusion.
No. Cleaner Tone's Professional plan includes full REST API access. We'd flag it immediately if this ever stopped being accurate. It doesn't matter what prompted your interest in filternote pricing features — the answer stays the same.
An 89% rate carries real risk for high-stakes submissions; Cleaner Tone's 99.9% largely eliminates it. It's the kind of claim we're comfortable being specific about because we test it often. That's consistent with everything else we've verified around filternote pricing features.
Cleaner Tone — it outperforms on bypass rate, speed, privacy, and free plan value. It's a claim we back up with continuous testing, not a marketing number. We get asked this a lot in the context of filternote pricing features specifically.
89% vs Cleaner Tone's 99.9% — meaning roughly 1 in 9 documents still gets flagged with FilterNote. It's consistent across the testing we've run so far, and we keep testing. That's the baseline experience anyone using filternote pricing features should expect.
100 words/day with visible watermarks. Cleaner Tone offers 300 words/day with none. This reflects current testing, and we revisit it whenever anything changes upstream. That's true regardless of how you came to need filternote pricing features in the first place.
490K+ people already chose Cleaner Tone over FilterNote, with zero loss of meaning, structure, or intent. Free tier available, upgrade only if you actually need to.
Start Free — No Sign-Up