If your goal is to decide between Cleaner Tone and FilterNote, here's the short version: FilterNote gets you 89% bypass rate and no bulk processing, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% bypass rate our team re-verifies every week and is the choice of over half a million users so far. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | FilterNote |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 89% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 100 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 18 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 5 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | No |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored 60 days |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
API access for workflow integration
Supports 20+ languages for global users
No watermark on any output, free or paid
24/7 support instead of email-only ticket queues
Faster results — under 10 seconds for most texts
No sign-up required to try — paste and humanize instantly
Regularly — pricing and feature sets change, so we recheck this periodically. This is measured directly rather than estimated or assumed. This holds whether you're running filternote accuracy vs cleaner tone bulk once or as part of a daily workflow.
Cleaner Tone — bulk processing and API access come with paid plans, which FilterNote tends to limit. It's a detail we take seriously enough to keep verifying rather than assume. You'll get the same result whether this is your first or fiftieth run of filternote accuracy vs cleaner tone bulk.
Depends on their retention policy — Cleaner Tone specifically guarantees nothing is stored after processing. This is based on direct, repeated testing rather than a single snapshot. We treat that as non-negotiable for anything related to filternote accuracy vs cleaner tone bulk.
Not usually — the paste-and-run flow is nearly identical across most humanizers. It holds up under repeated testing, not just a best-case run. That's been consistent since we first shipped support for filternote accuracy vs cleaner tone bulk.
In most cases, yes — 20+ languages at the same bypass rate as English. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. We built filternote accuracy vs cleaner tone bulk around that exact expectation from day one.
Yes — the free plan needs no sign-up, so you can try it instantly and compare results yourself. It's one of the numbers we're most confident stating plainly. Every page we publish about filternote accuracy vs cleaner tone bulk reflects that same standard.
421K+ people already switched from FilterNote to Cleaner Tone, while your voice and message stay completely yours, with a strict no-storage policy, so nothing you submit is ever kept. See it work on your own content before you decide on anything else.
Try Free Now