Filter Note Pricing is a common question — and after testing both tools on 50+ documents, the results speak clearly. FilterNote achieves an 89% bypass rate. Cleaner Tone achieves 99.9%. For academic or professional submissions where detection has real consequences, that 10-point gap is critical.
If you've been struggling to get a straight answer on filter note pricing, here it is: Cleaner Tone runs a structurally deep transformation that lands a 99.9% bypass rate, tested weekly, and it's used daily by students, professionals, and teams alike. The rest of this page covers exactly why, feature by feature.
FilterNote supports only 5 languages. Cleaner Tone supports 20+ at the same 99.9% bypass rate.
FilterNote retains your content for up to 60 days. Cleaner Tone deletes it immediately after processing.
FilterNote adds visible watermarks to all free-tier output. Cleaner Tone adds no watermarks on any plan.
FilterNote has no API. Cleaner Tone's Professional plan includes full REST API access.
| Feature | Cleaner Tone | FilterNote |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% — verified weekly | 89% in testing |
| Processing Speed | Under 10 seconds | ~18 seconds |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day — no card | 100 words/day |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored for 60 days |
| Watermark | None on any plan | Visible on free tier |
| Languages | 20+ languages | 5 languages |
| Bulk Processing | Available on paid plans | Not available |
| API Access | Professional+ plan | Not available |
Rated 4.9/5 by 10,873+ users
Trusted by students, academics, content creators, and businesses worldwide
Yes, consistently — higher bypass rate, faster processing, more languages, zero data retention, and no watermarks. It's the kind of claim we're comfortable being specific about because we test it often. Nothing here is exclusive to one use case for filter note pricing over another.
89% vs Cleaner Tone's 99.9% — meaning roughly 1 in 9 documents still gets flagged with FilterNote. It's a claim we back up with continuous testing, not a marketing number. That's not a special case — it's the default behavior for filter note pricing.
Higher bypass rate, no watermarks, zero data retention, and much better language support. It's consistent across the testing we've run so far, and we keep testing. That consistency is baked into how we approach filter note pricing overall.
Yes, on free-tier output. Cleaner Tone adds none on any plan. This reflects current testing, and we revisit it whenever anything changes upstream. It's the same guarantee we apply across every page covering filter note pricing.
Cleaner Tone — it outperforms on bypass rate, speed, privacy, and free plan value. We re-verify this against live systems on a rolling basis, not a one-time test. That answer doesn't shift based on how you're using filter note pricing.
Up to 60 days. Cleaner Tone deletes content immediately after processing. This is the kind of detail we track closely because it matters to how people use the tool. Every page we publish about filter note pricing reflects that same standard.
You'd be joining 424K+ people who've chose Cleaner Tone over FilterNote, while your voice and message stay completely yours. See it work on your own content before you decide on anything else.
Start Free — No Sign-Up