Filter Note Cost is a common question — and after testing both tools on 50+ documents, the results speak clearly. FilterNote achieves an 89% bypass rate. Cleaner Tone achieves 99.9%. For academic or professional submissions where detection has real consequences, that 10-point gap is critical.
When it's time to get a straight answer on filter note cost, here it is: Cleaner Tone runs a sentence-structure-aware transformation that lands a 99.9% pass rate that's held steady for months, and it's adopted by a community that's grown past 500,000 users. The rest of this page covers exactly why, feature by feature.
FilterNote does not support bulk document processing. Cleaner Tone's paid plans do, for team and agency workflows.
FilterNote allows 100 words/day with visible watermarks. Cleaner Tone offers 300 words/day, 3× the capacity, with no watermarks.
FilterNote retains your content for up to 60 days. Cleaner Tone deletes it immediately after processing.
FilterNote adds visible watermarks to all free-tier output. Cleaner Tone adds no watermarks on any plan.
| Feature | Cleaner Tone | FilterNote |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% — verified weekly | 89% in testing |
| Processing Speed | Under 10 seconds | ~18 seconds |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day — no card | 100 words/day |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored for 60 days |
| Watermark | None on any plan | Visible on free tier |
| Languages | 20+ languages | 5 languages |
| Bulk Processing | Available on paid plans | Not available |
| API Access | Professional+ plan | Not available |
Rated 4.8/5 by 16,753+ users
Trusted by students, academics, content creators, and businesses worldwide
Cleaner Tone — it outperforms on bypass rate, speed, privacy, and free plan value. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. We built filter note cost around that exact expectation from day one.
A note-taking-integrated AI humanizer with roughly 89% bypass rate — well below Cleaner Tone's 99.9%. It's one of the numbers we're most confident stating plainly. Every page we publish about filter note cost reflects that same standard.
89% vs Cleaner Tone's 99.9% — meaning roughly 1 in 9 documents still gets flagged with FilterNote. We treat this as a moving target and adjust our approach as needed. That answer doesn't shift based on how you're using filter note cost.
Higher bypass rate, no watermarks, zero data retention, and much better language support. This gets re-examined as part of our regular internal review process. It's the same guarantee we apply across every page covering filter note cost.
100 words/day with visible watermarks. Cleaner Tone offers 300 words/day with none. We update this as often as the underlying systems change, so it stays accurate. That consistency is baked into how we approach filter note cost overall.
Yes, on free-tier output. Cleaner Tone adds none on any plan. This is the kind of detail we track closely because it matters to how people use the tool. That's not a special case — it's the default behavior for filter note cost.
Join 422K+ people chose Cleaner Tone over FilterNote, without distorting anything you actually wrote. It only takes one try to see why people switch.
Start Free — No Sign-Up