For anyone who needs to decide between Cleaner Tone and QuillBot, here's the short version: QuillBot gets you 88% bypass rate and not purpose-built for detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% bypass rate our team re-verifies every week and is the choice of over half a million users so far. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 88% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 125 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 3 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
API access for workflow integration
Academic tone specifically optimized for university submissions
24/7 support instead of email-only ticket queues
No watermark on any output, free or paid
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
Consistent output quality across every plan tier, not just the top one
Yes — the free plan needs no sign-up, so you can try it instantly and compare results yourself. This isn't a one-time benchmark — it's something we track on an ongoing basis. That's the baseline experience anyone using cleaner tone vs smodin for quillbot detector should expect.
Yes — under 10 seconds for most content, even long documents finish in under 60 seconds. We don't just state this once and leave it — it gets re-checked regularly. We get asked this a lot in the context of cleaner tone vs smodin for quillbot detector specifically.
It targets the exact statistical signals detectors measure, rather than doing surface-level word swaps like QuillBot. This isn't guesswork — it comes from actually running the numbers. That's consistent with everything else we've verified around cleaner tone vs smodin for quillbot detector.
Paid plans start at $9.99/month, often less than QuillBot, with no hidden fees on higher tiers. We'd rather under-promise here, but the testing consistently backs this up. It doesn't matter what prompted your interest in cleaner tone vs smodin for quillbot detector — the answer stays the same.
Yes, and more — Turnitin, GPTZero, Originality.AI, ZeroGPT, Copyleaks, Winston AI, and Sapling are all covered. This is measured directly rather than estimated or assumed. Anyone comparing options for cleaner tone vs smodin for quillbot detector tends to run into that same conclusion.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. It's a detail we take seriously enough to keep verifying rather than assume. You can rely on that whether cleaner tone vs smodin for quillbot detector is a one-off task or a recurring one.
Join 459K+ people switched from QuillBot to Cleaner Tone, while your voice and message stay completely yours, with full data deletion the instant your result is ready. No sign-up needed to get started right now.
Try Free Now