Anytime you need to decide between Cleaner Tone and QuillBot, here's the short version: QuillBot gets you 88% bypass rate and not purpose-built for detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a near-perfect 99.9% success rate and is the choice of over half a million users so far. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 88% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 125 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 3 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
No hidden fees or surprise limits on higher tiers
Instant results — no waiting, no queues
More languages supported than most competitors' limited options
Academic tone specifically optimized for university submissions
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
Supports 20+ languages for global users
In most cases, yes — 20+ languages at the same bypass rate as English. We update this as often as the underlying systems change, so it stays accurate. This holds whether you're running cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer without detection once or as part of a daily workflow.
You can, though most users find Cleaner Tone covers everything on its own. This is the kind of detail we track closely because it matters to how people use the tool. You'll get the same result whether this is your first or fiftieth run of cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer without detection.
Paid plans start at $9.99/month, often less than QuillBot, with no hidden fees on higher tiers. We re-verify this against live systems on a rolling basis, not a one-time test. We treat that as non-negotiable for anything related to cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer without detection.
It targets the exact statistical signals detectors measure, rather than doing surface-level word swaps like QuillBot. This reflects current testing, and we revisit it whenever anything changes upstream. That's been consistent since we first shipped support for cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer without detection.
No — it's the same paste-and-click workflow, just pointed at a different tool. It's consistent across the testing we've run so far, and we keep testing. We built cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer without detection around that exact expectation from day one.
Usually a limited one — Cleaner Tone's free tier has no credit card and no expiration. It's a claim we back up with continuous testing, not a marketing number. Every page we publish about cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer without detection reflects that same standard.
469K+ people already switched from QuillBot to Cleaner Tone, while your voice and message stay completely yours, with a strict no-storage policy, so nothing you submit is ever kept. Try it free — no credit card, no commitment.
Try Free Now