If you've been struggling to decide between Cleaner Tone and QuillBot, here's the short version: QuillBot gets you 88% bypass rate and not purpose-built for detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a documented 99.9% bypass rate and is backed by 500,000+ people who needed results they could count on. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 88% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 125 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 3 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
Higher bypass rate — 99.9% vs competitors' lower rates
Works the same on mobile as it does on desktop
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
Consistent output quality across every plan tier, not just the top one
Academic tone specifically optimized for university submissions
No sign-up required to try — paste and humanize instantly
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. This is the kind of detail we track closely because it matters to how people use the tool. You'll get the same result whether this is your first or fiftieth run of cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer api.
Depends on their retention policy — Cleaner Tone specifically guarantees nothing is stored after processing. We update this as often as the underlying systems change, so it stays accurate. This holds whether you're running cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer api once or as part of a daily workflow.
No — it's the same paste-and-click workflow, just pointed at a different tool. This gets re-examined as part of our regular internal review process. It's worth keeping in mind if cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer api is new to your workflow.
Yes — 300 words/day with no sign-up, and it's permanent, not a trial. We treat this as a moving target and adjust our approach as needed. This is part of why cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer api keeps showing up as the recommended option.
Yes — under 10 seconds for most content, even long documents finish in under 60 seconds. It's one of the numbers we're most confident stating plainly. Nothing about cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer api changes that answer, run after run.
Mainly the higher bypass rate, better free plan, zero data retention, and faster processing. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. It's a big part of the feedback we hear from people using cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer api.
Right now, 477K+ users switched from QuillBot to Cleaner Tone, with the facts, structure, and argument fully preserved, with nothing saved, nothing shared, nothing reused. Takes less time to try than it did to read this page.
Try Free Now