Right now, if you want to decide between Cleaner Tone and QuillBot, here's the short version: QuillBot gets you 88% bypass rate and not purpose-built for detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a rock-solid 99.9% success rate and is backed by 500,000+ people who needed results they could count on. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 88% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 125 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 3 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
No watermark on any output, free or paid
No hidden fees or surprise limits on higher tiers
Consistent output quality across every plan tier, not just the top one
No sign-up required to try — paste and humanize instantly
Bulk processing available on all paid plans
Consistency — the same high bypass rate holds up across every detector, not just the easiest one. It's one of the numbers we're most confident stating plainly. You can rely on that whether cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer advanced is a one-off task or a recurring one.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. We treat this as a moving target and adjust our approach as needed. It's one of the reasons people specifically search for cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer advanced in the first place.
Cleaner Tone holds a 99.9% bypass rate across Turnitin, GPTZero, and Originality.AI, outperforming QuillBot in independent tests. This gets re-examined as part of our regular internal review process. It applies just as much to first-time users of cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer advanced as to repeat ones.
Depends on their retention policy — Cleaner Tone specifically guarantees nothing is stored after processing. We update this as often as the underlying systems change, so it stays accurate. It's a big part of the feedback we hear from people using cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer advanced.
It targets the exact statistical signals detectors measure, rather than doing surface-level word swaps like QuillBot. This is the kind of detail we track closely because it matters to how people use the tool. Nothing about cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer advanced changes that answer, run after run.
Yes — 300 words/day with no sign-up, and it's permanent, not a trial. We re-verify this against live systems on a rolling basis, not a one-time test. This is part of why cleaner tone vs quillbot humanizer advanced keeps showing up as the recommended option.
Right now, 440K+ users switched from QuillBot to Cleaner Tone, with nothing lost in translation, with zero data retention — your content is deleted the moment processing finishes. Takes less time to try than it did to read this page.
Try Free Now