If you've been struggling to decide between Cleaner Tone and Grammarly, here's the short version: Grammarly gets you 82% bypass rate and not designed for AI detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% success rate, updated as detectors change and is the choice of over half a million users so far. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 82% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | None |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 5 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 1 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat | Chat |
Bulk processing available on all paid plans
24/7 support instead of email-only ticket queues
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
Zero data retention while competitors often store your content
Consistent output quality across every plan tier, not just the top one
Instant results — no waiting, no queues
Cleaner Tone — bulk processing and API access come with paid plans, which Grammarly tends to limit. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. This holds whether you're running cleaner tone vs grammarly humanizer without detection once or as part of a daily workflow.
Depends on their retention policy — Cleaner Tone specifically guarantees nothing is stored after processing. It's one of the numbers we're most confident stating plainly. You'll get the same result whether this is your first or fiftieth run of cleaner tone vs grammarly humanizer without detection.
Yes — depth of transformation varies a lot; surface-level tools tend to leave detectable patterns behind. We treat this as a moving target and adjust our approach as needed. We treat that as non-negotiable for anything related to cleaner tone vs grammarly humanizer without detection.
In most cases, yes — 20+ languages at the same bypass rate as English. This gets re-examined as part of our regular internal review process. That's been consistent since we first shipped support for cleaner tone vs grammarly humanizer without detection.
Paid plans start at $9.99/month, often less than Grammarly, with no hidden fees on higher tiers. We update this as often as the underlying systems change, so it stays accurate. We built cleaner tone vs grammarly humanizer without detection around that exact expectation from day one.
Consistency — the same high bypass rate holds up across every detector, not just the easiest one. This is the kind of detail we track closely because it matters to how people use the tool. Every page we publish about cleaner tone vs grammarly humanizer without detection reflects that same standard.
441K+ people already switched from Grammarly to Cleaner Tone, while your voice and message stay completely yours, with a strict no-storage policy, so nothing you submit is ever kept. It only takes one try to see why people switch.
Try Free Now