For anyone who needs to decide between Cleaner Tone and FilterNote, here's the short version: FilterNote gets you 89% bypass rate and no bulk processing, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% bypass rate, tested weekly and is trusted by 500,000+ users worldwide. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | FilterNote |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 89% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 100 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 18 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 5 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | No |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored 60 days |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
Better free plan — 300 words/day with no credit card required
Academic tone specifically optimized for university submissions
Bulk processing available on all paid plans
Consistent output quality across every plan tier, not just the top one
Works the same on mobile as it does on desktop
No hidden fees or surprise limits on higher tiers
Yes — under 10 seconds for most content, even long documents finish in under 60 seconds. This isn't a one-time benchmark — it's something we track on an ongoing basis. We built cleaner tone vs filternote top around that exact expectation from day one.
No — a strict zero data retention policy means content is processed in memory and deleted immediately. We'd flag it immediately if this ever stopped being accurate. That's been consistent since we first shipped support for cleaner tone vs filternote top.
Yes — 300 words/day with no sign-up, and it's permanent, not a trial. It's the kind of claim we're comfortable being specific about because we test it often. We treat that as non-negotiable for anything related to cleaner tone vs filternote top.
Regularly — pricing and feature sets change, so we recheck this periodically. It's a claim we back up with continuous testing, not a marketing number. You'll get the same result whether this is your first or fiftieth run of cleaner tone vs filternote top.
Cleaner Tone, largely because of the Academic tone and consistent 99.9% rate against Turnitin and GPTZero. It's consistent across the testing we've run so far, and we keep testing. This holds whether you're running cleaner tone vs filternote top once or as part of a daily workflow.
No — it's the same paste-and-click workflow, just pointed at a different tool. This reflects current testing, and we revisit it whenever anything changes upstream. It's worth keeping in mind if cleaner tone vs filternote top is new to your workflow.
Join 421K+ people switched from FilterNote to Cleaner Tone, with zero loss of meaning, structure, or intent, with no logs, no storage, no second use of your text. Free tier available, upgrade only if you actually need to.
Try Free Now