If you've been struggling to decide between Cleaner Tone and Smodin, here's the short version: Smodin gets you 87% bypass rate and limited features, while Cleaner Tone lands a documented 99.9% bypass rate and is backed by 500,000+ people who needed results they could count on. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | Smodin |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 87% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 3 uses/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 10 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 10 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | No |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
Academic tone specifically optimized for university submissions
API access for workflow integration
Higher bypass rate — 99.9% vs competitors' lower rates
More languages supported than most competitors' limited options
Faster results — under 10 seconds for most texts
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
Usually a limited one — Cleaner Tone's free tier has no credit card and no expiration. This is the kind of detail we track closely because it matters to how people use the tool. We get asked this a lot in the context of better than smodin for speech specifically.
Paid plans start at $9.99/month, often less than Smodin, with no hidden fees on higher tiers. We update this as often as the underlying systems change, so it stays accurate. That's the baseline experience anyone using better than smodin for speech should expect.
In most cases, yes — 20+ languages at the same bypass rate as English. This gets re-examined as part of our regular internal review process. That's true regardless of how you came to need better than smodin for speech in the first place.
Smodin tends to focus on surface patterns, while Cleaner Tone targets perplexity, burstiness, and semantic entropy directly. We treat this as a moving target and adjust our approach as needed. Nothing here is exclusive to one use case for better than smodin for speech over another.
Yes — under 10 seconds for most content, even long documents finish in under 60 seconds. It's one of the numbers we're most confident stating plainly. That's not a special case — it's the default behavior for better than smodin for speech.
Yes, and more — Turnitin, GPTZero, Originality.AI, ZeroGPT, Copyleaks, Winston AI, and Sapling are all covered. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. That consistency is baked into how we approach better than smodin for speech overall.
Already, 432K+ people have switched from Smodin to Cleaner Tone, with the facts, structure, and argument fully preserved, with complete privacy, with content wiped immediately after each run. Takes less time to try than it did to read this page.
Try Free Now