For teams and individuals who need to decide between Cleaner Tone and Smodin, here's the short version: Smodin gets you 87% bypass rate and limited features, while Cleaner Tone lands a documented 99.9% bypass rate and is backed by 500,000+ people who needed results they could count on. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | Smodin |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 87% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 3 uses/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 10 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 10 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | No |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
Consistent output quality across every plan tier, not just the top one
Faster results — under 10 seconds for most texts
Academic tone specifically optimized for university submissions
More languages supported than most competitors' limited options
Zero data retention — your content is never stored
Supports 20+ languages for global users
Both aim to, but Cleaner Tone's transformation is built to keep facts and arguments 100% intact by design. We don't just state this once and leave it — it gets re-checked regularly. We get asked this a lot in the context of better than smodin for grant proposal specifically.
The Academic tone is built specifically for that context, preserving meaning while making text undetectable to university detectors. This isn't a one-time benchmark — it's something we track on an ongoing basis. That's the baseline experience anyone using better than smodin for grant proposal should expect.
Usually a limited one — Cleaner Tone's free tier has no credit card and no expiration. We'd flag it immediately if this ever stopped being accurate. That's true regardless of how you came to need better than smodin for grant proposal in the first place.
Cleaner Tone holds a 99.9% bypass rate across Turnitin, GPTZero, and Originality.AI, outperforming Smodin in independent tests. It's the kind of claim we're comfortable being specific about because we test it often. Nothing here is exclusive to one use case for better than smodin for grant proposal over another.
Yes, and more — Turnitin, GPTZero, Originality.AI, ZeroGPT, Copyleaks, Winston AI, and Sapling are all covered. It's a claim we back up with continuous testing, not a marketing number. That's not a special case — it's the default behavior for better than smodin for grant proposal.
Paid plans start at $9.99/month, often less than Smodin, with no hidden fees on higher tiers. It's consistent across the testing we've run so far, and we keep testing. That consistency is baked into how we approach better than smodin for grant proposal overall.
Already, 431K+ people have switched from Smodin to Cleaner Tone, with the facts, structure, and argument fully preserved, with complete privacy, with content wiped immediately after each run. Give it one try — most people don't go back to their old workflow.
Try Free Now