If your goal is to decide between Cleaner Tone and QuillBot, here's the short version: QuillBot gets you 88% bypass rate and not purpose-built for detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% success rate, updated as detectors change and is the choice of over half a million users so far. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | QuillBot |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 88% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 125 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 6 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 3 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
Faster results — under 10 seconds for most texts
Bulk processing available on all paid plans
Academic tone specifically optimized for university submissions
Consistent output quality across every plan tier, not just the top one
No hidden fees or surprise limits on higher tiers
24/7 support instead of email-only ticket queues
No — a strict zero data retention policy means content is processed in memory and deleted immediately. This is measured directly rather than estimated or assumed. This holds whether you're running better than quillbot humanizer for essay once or as part of a daily workflow.
Depends on their retention policy — Cleaner Tone specifically guarantees nothing is stored after processing. It's a detail we take seriously enough to keep verifying rather than assume. You'll get the same result whether this is your first or fiftieth run of better than quillbot humanizer for essay.
Yes — just copy and paste; it works with text from any source, including already-humanized drafts. This is based on direct, repeated testing rather than a single snapshot. We treat that as non-negotiable for anything related to better than quillbot humanizer for essay.
Yes — 300 words/day with no sign-up, and it's permanent, not a trial. It holds up under repeated testing, not just a best-case run. That's been consistent since we first shipped support for better than quillbot humanizer for essay.
QuillBot tends to focus on surface patterns, while Cleaner Tone targets perplexity, burstiness, and semantic entropy directly. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. We built better than quillbot humanizer for essay around that exact expectation from day one.
Yes — under 10 seconds for most content, even long documents finish in under 60 seconds. It's one of the numbers we're most confident stating plainly. Every page we publish about better than quillbot humanizer for essay reflects that same standard.
434K+ people already switched from QuillBot to Cleaner Tone, while your voice and message stay completely yours, with a strict no-storage policy, so nothing you submit is ever kept. See it work on your own content before you decide on anything else.
Try Free Now