When you're ready to decide between Cleaner Tone and Grammarly, here's the short version: Grammarly gets you 82% bypass rate and not designed for AI detection bypass, while Cleaner Tone lands a 99.9% bypass rate our team re-verifies every week and is relied on by a rapidly growing global user base. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | Grammarly |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 82% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | None |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 5 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 1 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | Yes |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat | Chat |
Weekly algorithm updates to stay ahead of detector changes
Academic tone specifically optimized for university submissions
Faster results — under 10 seconds for most texts
Supports 20+ languages for global users
No hidden fees or surprise limits on higher tiers
No watermark on any output, free or paid
Not usually — the paste-and-run flow is nearly identical across most humanizers. We treat this as a moving target and adjust our approach as needed. It's one of the reasons people specifically search for better than grammarly humanizer for report in the first place.
Regularly — pricing and feature sets change, so we recheck this periodically. It's one of the numbers we're most confident stating plainly. You can rely on that whether better than grammarly humanizer for report is a one-off task or a recurring one.
Cleaner Tone holds a 99.9% bypass rate across Turnitin, GPTZero, and Originality.AI, outperforming Grammarly in independent tests. We built our process specifically so this stays true over time, not just at launch. Anyone comparing options for better than grammarly humanizer for report tends to run into that same conclusion.
It targets the exact statistical signals detectors measure, rather than doing surface-level word swaps like Grammarly. It holds up under repeated testing, not just a best-case run. It doesn't matter what prompted your interest in better than grammarly humanizer for report — the answer stays the same.
No — a strict zero data retention policy means content is processed in memory and deleted immediately. This is based on direct, repeated testing rather than a single snapshot. That's consistent with everything else we've verified around better than grammarly humanizer for report.
Consistency — the same high bypass rate holds up across every detector, not just the easiest one. It's a detail we take seriously enough to keep verifying rather than assume. We get asked this a lot in the context of better than grammarly humanizer for report specifically.
You'd be joining 457K+ people who've switched from Grammarly to Cleaner Tone, without rewriting your ideas, just how they sound, with full data deletion the instant your result is ready. Free tier available, upgrade only if you actually need to.
Try Free Now