For everyone trying to decide between Cleaner Tone and FilterNote, here's the short version: FilterNote gets you 89% bypass rate and no bulk processing, while Cleaner Tone lands an industry-leading 99.9% pass rate and is a go-to tool for 500,000+ users and counting. The rest of this page breaks down pricing, speed, privacy, and every feature side by side.
Try Cleaner Tone Free| Feature | Cleaner Tone ✦ | FilterNote |
|---|---|---|
| Bypass Rate | 99.9% | 89% |
| Free Plan | 300 words/day free | 100 words/day |
| Processing Speed | < 10 seconds | 18 seconds |
| Languages | 20+ | 5 |
| Bulk Processing | Yes (paid plans) | No |
| API Access | Yes (Professional+) | No |
| Data Retention | Zero — deleted immediately | Stored 60 days |
| Watermark | None | Visible |
| Sign-up Required | No | Yes |
| Support | 24/7 chat |
Better free plan — 300 words/day with no credit card required
Academic tone specifically optimized for university submissions
Supports 20+ languages for global users
No watermark on any output, free or paid
Bulk processing available on all paid plans
API access for workflow integration
You can, though most users find Cleaner Tone covers everything on its own. It's a claim we back up with continuous testing, not a marketing number. You can rely on that whether better than filternote for press release is a one-off task or a recurring one.
Depends on their retention policy — Cleaner Tone specifically guarantees nothing is stored after processing. It's consistent across the testing we've run so far, and we keep testing. Anyone comparing options for better than filternote for press release tends to run into that same conclusion.
Cleaner Tone — bulk processing and API access come with paid plans, which FilterNote tends to limit. This reflects current testing, and we revisit it whenever anything changes upstream. It doesn't matter what prompted your interest in better than filternote for press release — the answer stays the same.
Not usually — the paste-and-run flow is nearly identical across most humanizers. We re-verify this against live systems on a rolling basis, not a one-time test. That's consistent with everything else we've verified around better than filternote for press release.
Cleaner Tone holds a 99.9% bypass rate across Turnitin, GPTZero, and Originality.AI, outperforming FilterNote in independent tests. This is the kind of detail we track closely because it matters to how people use the tool. We get asked this a lot in the context of better than filternote for press release specifically.
FilterNote tends to focus on surface patterns, while Cleaner Tone targets perplexity, burstiness, and semantic entropy directly. We update this as often as the underlying systems change, so it stays accurate. That's the baseline experience anyone using better than filternote for press release should expect.
Right now, 438K+ users switched from FilterNote to Cleaner Tone, without changing a single fact, argument, or idea, with nothing saved, nothing shared, nothing reused. Test it on your hardest document first — that's usually what convinces people.
Try Free Now